« The Variable Positive Meniscus-My second shot | Main | Gundlach Meniscus »

The Variable Positive Meniscus-Reproducing the 'look' of the early Pinkhams

Yes......I've come full circle, after 7-8 years of experimenting w/combining hollow barrel shells/magnifiers/magnifying glass/junk lenses/taping/jury rigging to produce 'homemade' lenses which I'd hoped in my ignorance would mimic the early classic soft focus lenses, I've finally fashioned the Variable Positive Meniscus which incredibly does produce the look of the Pinkham & Smith Semi-Achromatic Series 1/Karl Struss classics.

My experiements started years ago w/Cyclops which was in fact several prototypes under that moniker, their common characteristics was that they produced softness in abundance, but mostly 'mush', and considering that I used a total ingnorance of any understanding of optics to produce these lenses, I was extremely lucky to get even that.

From then until now, I began to learn the rudiments of optics, the five Von Seidel aberrations, how an achromatic double was constructed, and some of the lens formulas that were used in these classic soft focus lenses.  I began to understand the length and breadth of what I DIDN'T KNOW, but I resolved to copy the construction of the Pinkham Semi-Achromatic Series 1 and Karl Struss classics anyway.

I used acc. adaptor rings to connect the front of a Large Format Goerz Artar barrel shell to an Ilex #5 shutter.   The Artar barrel had both 67mm acc. thread on both the front and rear of the barrel making it perfect for attaching accessories to this barrel. 

I then looked for an optics/glass manufacturer who would sell me the positive meniscus lens elements similar to the ones that were used in both the above mentioned Pinkham and Karl Struss classics and was able to purchase three positive meniscii w/a the diopter strength equal to 235mm, 286mm, and 400mm, with all three elements being the same diameter so I could exchange them at the rear of the Artar barrel.

These three meniscii were all 65mm in diameter and I was able to insert them into a 67mm male to male accessory sleeve which was sandwiched in between two 62mm-67mm step up rings where everthing was such a snug fit that the glass was centered so that when I screwed all of this into the rear of the Artar barrel, the center optical axis of the meniscii was lined up with the exact center axis of the Artar barrel.

The Variable Positive Meniscus is a little sharper at the foreground point of focus than both the Karl Struss and the Pinkham SA Series 1, and is easier to focus, but it has the same elegant transition from foreground clarity to a soft glow toward the background as the lenses it was based on.   I make no claim of having created anything, which I was never trying to do in the first place and I'm in fact very happy that I've been able to copy these classic lenses w/something that I was able to get to work despite my lack of knowledge of optics.  

Regardless of any of this, the lens is here, and I've uploaded the first shot from it, which is a Slink wound around a thing strip of Aluminum to hold its shape which I've modeled after a sine wave, and that's in fact what it's called, 'Sine Wave'.

I wanted to get this first pic uploaded first, I'll add pics of the actual lens later.

 

Take care

 

 

Posted on Thursday, May 7, 2009 at 02:42AM by Registered CommenterJonathan Brewer | Comments3 Comments

Reader Comments (3)

Well done Jonathan. I also read with "interest" the bokeh post and the myriad comments based on little more than opinion. For me I'm sure the guys that designed our wonderful old lenses knew exactly what they wanted to create.

The look of the image you posted [the second one] is very "classic".

Well done. It is very satisfying when you can do something just a bit different based on your own talent.

Steve

May 8, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterSteve Nicholls

Thanks very kindly Steve

Oh yeah........They sure did know what they were doing, and bigtime!!! What played a major part in getting me interested in photography was my spending time as a small child going through our family album w/my parents. The images were all professional, done w/professional equipment, and I think that professionalism ran the gamut from the photographers of long ago to the people who created these lenses 100-200 yrs ago.

I was amazed at how mean spirited and arrogant and dismissive some folks can be as they pretend they've read the minds of the creative geniuses who gave us these lenses starting circa 200 yrs ago.

What I like about all of this is that F. Holland Day and Smith and Karl Struss were tinkerers and dreamers and risk takers and they realized their dreams w/these lenses, and we get to be a part of, and continue/carry on what they started.

There will be others after us that look at and read about what we did, and they'll carry on after us.

Take care

May 8, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterJonathan Brewer

This is a beautiful shot! Wish I'd thought of it first :~'))

I love how the inner and outer begin to merge so it looks like it has a solid outer surface of some sort.

May 13, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterJim Galli

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>