Same shot, same SM, by the Visual Quality.  There's true diversity w/this series, there's the Tessar w/diff contro alias the Wolly Velostigmat II,  and Kodak's version of the Pinkham Semi-Achromatic w/a coating, and as Jim Galli has mentioned, the Pinkham VQ, nee a modified rectilinear.

I'd mention what struck me about the Visual Quality version considering that  the Kodak Portrait has a coating and the VQ Doesn't, which is there's less flare/halation/a glow from the VQ versus the Kodak.  Both shots w/these lenses were w/my Universal #5 shutter, same exp., same shutter time.   The Pinkham exhibits very little glow compared to the Kodak Portrait, I was surprised.

Again, I love shooting clear lightbulbs w/this type of lens because I think this type of SM magnifies the nuance/differences of these lenses.   

I've been surprised by the similarities between these images from three very different lenses construction wise.   I haven't done anything/corrected the colors in any way, and there isn't a lick of difference colorwise between these 3 shots.

Take care